Ford Ranger Fuel Consumption
The fuel consumption of the Ford Ranger varies depending on the specific model and engine type. Here are some specific fuel consumption figures for different Ford Ranger models:
– The fuel consumption of the 2021 Ford Ranger 2.2L XLT 4×2 MT is 10 km/l.
– The fuel consumption of the 2021 Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 MT is 8.8 km/l.
– The 2022 Ford Ranger line-up has a combined fuel consumption figure as low as 6.9L/100km for 4×2 versions of the bi-turbo 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel variants and as high as 11.5L/100km for the twin-turbo 3.0-litre petrol V6 in the second-generation 2022 Ford Ranger Raptor.
– The 2023 Ford Ranger has a consumption figure of 6.9L/100km for a manual variant of the twin-turbo 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel and 11.5L/100km for the twin-turbo V6 petrol-powered Ford Ranger Raptor.
These figures provide a range of fuel consumption values for different Ford Ranger models, indicating that the fuel consumption per 100km can vary significantly based on the specific model and engine type.
Contents
- What is the fuel consumption rate of the Ford Ranger?
- How far can a Ford Ranger go on a full tank?
- What is the gas mileage on a 2.3 L Ford Ranger?
- How many miles per gallon does a 2.7 L Ford Ranger get?
- How many miles to the gallon does a Ford Ranger do?
- What is the fuel economy of a Ranger V6?
- What is the real fuel consumption of a Ford Ranger?
- Is a Ford Ranger good on gas?
- What is the fuel economy of the Ford Ranger V6?
- Is the Ranger V6 worth it?
What is the fuel consumption rate of the Ford Ranger?
The fuel economy on the Ranger XLT is great too. In urban driving conditions, we expect somewhere around 9 km/l, but on the highway, it goes up closer to 15 km/l.
How far can a Ford Ranger go on a full tank?
If you drive more conservatively you can pretty easily get over 400 miles on a tank.
What is the gas mileage on a 2.3 L Ford Ranger?
Here’s what you get with the 2.3L EcoBoost® I-4 engine when you look at the available fuel efficiency numbers for the 2023 version: Ford Ranger 4×2: Ford Ranger XL: 21 city mpg / 26 highway mpg. Ford Ranger XLT: 21 city mpg / 26 highway mpg.
How many miles per gallon does a 2.7 L Ford Ranger get?
2024 Ford Ranger
Vehicle | EPA Fuel Economy | Annual Fuel Cost |
---|---|---|
2024 Ford Ranger 4WD 2.7 L, 6 cyl, Automatic (S10), Turbo, Regular Gasoline | ||
20 MPG 19 23 combined city/hwy city hwy 5.0 gal/100 mi | $2,550 | |
Range not available | ||
2024 Ford Ranger RAPTOR 4WD 3.0 L, 6 cyl, Automatic (S10), Turbo, Regular Gasoline |
How many miles to the gallon does a Ford Ranger do?
A big, blunt-shaped truck is never going to be the most economical vehicle, so the best we can say is that the Ranger is at least par for the class. It averages between 27.2mpg for the 3.0-litre V6 in Wildtrak X trim up to 33.6mpg for the XLT with the 170hp 2.0-litre diesel with the manual gearbox.
What is the fuel economy of a Ranger V6?
8.4 litres per 100km
Claimed fuel economy for the V6 is 8.4 litres per 100km on the combined cycle, and the ute has an 80L fuel tank.
What is the real fuel consumption of a Ford Ranger?
Based on data from 33 vehicles, 755 fuel-ups and 193,029 miles of driving, the 2023 Ford Ranger gets a combined Avg MPG of 19.25 with a 0.39 MPG margin of error.
Is a Ford Ranger good on gas?
It’s also because the 2023 Ford Ranger mpg ratings are undeniably impressive. With up to 26 mpg on the highway, you’ll never feel held back from adventure.
What is the fuel economy of the Ford Ranger V6?
The V6 makes more power and torque (184kW/600Nm v 154kW/500Nm) but is also a bit thirstier (claimed 8.4L/100km combined v 7.6L/100km), though in our experience in day-to-day driving there isn’t a whole lot of difference in thirst between the two due to the need to work the four-pot a bit harder.
Is the Ranger V6 worth it?
The V6 makes more power and torque (184kW/600Nm v 154kW/500Nm) but is also a bit thirstier (claimed 8.4L/100km combined v 7.6L/100km), though in our experience in day-to-day driving there isn’t a whole lot of difference in thirst between the two due to the need to work the four-pot a bit harder.